Studies on Radiation have been on-going since 1896. Over a 100 years of study.

September 1, 2012

Studies on Radiation have been on-going since 1896. Over a 100 years of study. Studies via atomic bomb development, exposure to the atomic bomb, nuclear disasters involving both humans and animals have also been done. The results will be made depending on “who is paying for the study”. It is a mistake to think that what is concluded about the study was done without any consideration to WHO IS PAYING FOR THE STUDY. This is the most important part of a study that people seem to forget. The only truth of a study is that there are always VICTIMS that may or may not know that they are just being used for “data collection.”

The article about Research done on the VICTIMS of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, both the parents and the babies, may shed some of the “illusions” that people have about Research. The Researchers treated them as nothing but “data” to be collected. This is the SAME approach as is done with “animals” that are used.”Science sans conscience n’est que ruine de l’âme” = “Science without conscience is the destruction of the soul” ~
Francois Rabelais


Organ samples and medical records on more than 1,200 babies who were stillborn or died shortly after birth after being carried by mothers who survived the 1945 U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were sent to the United States for radiation research, a researcher in Hiroshima says. The Most Important question is : Did they ask Permission to take samples or Did they do this secretly?

September 1, 2012

This article should not be of surprise to anyone that is familiar with “scientific” research.  The Researchers/scientists will do anything to publish.  The question of importance would be : did they notify the parents of the baby that they were going to take samples? My answer would be : NO.  The samples would be taken “on the sly”.  And, then, those samples used for Research.  If you do not think that the same will be done or has already been done, you are thinking incorrectly.  Samples are taken all the time.  Have you ever had a biopsy?  That sample was sent off to be tested, and if there was something of interest in that sample, that sample would then be researched.  Some places will take that sample, develop a “cell line” and then they can SELL that line of cells to others.  They would be making money off of your tissue from that biopsy.  This does happen.
Monday, April 23, 2012

Huge scale of A-bomb gene study revealed Medical records of 1,200 babies of hibakusha shipped to U.S.
Kyodo
HIROSHIMA — Organ samples and medical records on more than 1,200 babies who were stillborn or died shortly after birth after being carried by mothers who survived the 1945 U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were sent to the United States for radiation research, a researcher in Hiroshima says.

It has been known that the United States conducted research on how radiation influences genetics, and that samples from A-bomb victims and their newborns in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were sent there during the Allied Occupation following World War II. But this is believed to be the first time that the scale of the study has been revealed because it was classified as military information and thus had been secret.

Hiroko Takahashi, an assistant professor at the Hiroshima Peace Institute, has said internal documents from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology show that some 77,000 newborns were studied between 1948 and 1954. She estimates that tissue samples and records from more than 1,200 newborns were sent to the United States.

“Newborns were treated in the same way as guinea pigs for the study of nuclear weapons and radiation,” Takahashi said, adding that the “current radiation standard” is based upon that.

In February 1951, Elbert DeCoursey, then director of the AFIP, asked the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission, which was conducting research in Japan, to send fixed samples from newborns to the U.S.

The AFIP received a reply in April the same year from Grant Taylor, director of the ABCC, saying it would send several hundred samples preserved in formalin within two months, Takahashi said, citing the documents.

About 850 body organs and parts of babies were sent to the United States between 1952 and 1953, and several thousand tissue samples were sent in 1955, she said, adding that a total of 1,250 medical records were shipped there between 1951 and 1955.

The ABCC concluded after the research that there was no genetic influence stemming from radiation at that stage.

“Almost 100 percent of the newborns in the city of Hiroshima were studied and if they died, an autopsy was performed on all of them,” a former Japanese researcher said.

The ABCC took advantage of the food rationing system in place in Japan at the time, which gave priority to pregnant women, to obtain information on their whereabouts in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most of the doctors and nurses there told the ABCC when newborns died because they were asked to cooperate. Some of the body samples and medical records were returned to Japan from around 1970 and are now being kept at Hiroshima University and Nagasaki University.

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20120423a2.html

http://enenews.com/professor-japan-newborns-were-treated-like-guinea-pigs-for-study-of-nuclear-weapons-and-radiation-stillborn-babies-shipped-to-us-for-research


‘Chief of boar affairs’ to fight damage by wild animals in Nagasaki. And, the other story, the Fukushima Exclusion Zone Pigs.

October 30, 2011

Japanese Wild Boar with her babies

I will start this out with asking you, what word is missing from this article?  That’s right, FERAL.  These are wild animals in Nagasaki.  The timing of this article is clever.  The Government of  Japan is showing a reason why the Fukushima pigs need to be culled.  The issue that the Government of Japan’s Ministry of Environment ‘s Minister, Goshi Hosono, has with the pigs is that the pigs are causing damage to the Fukushima residents property.  The only difference would be that the boars are wild and have not gone through what the Fukushima pigs have gone through to survive.  The wild pigs are not domesticated and have plenty of food to scavenge.  The domesticated pigs that were set free by their owners are not finding cultivated farmer’s fields to eat.  The boar are not subject, yet, to a ” take no survivors” culling campaign.  Their domesticated cousins are enduring an outright slaughter fest, like the one happening in Fukushima.  Did you think that the Government of Japan was not “euthanizing” animals anymore because its not in the news? 

If you did think that, then you are wrong.  The Government of Japan has never stopped ” euthanizing” animals in the Fukushima exclusion zone.  They are catching and killing, I will not use this word, “euthanize” without the quotation marks, since  ” euthanize” is not the correct word to use for the way these animals are killed.  The Government of Japan would have you believe that these animals go down in the proper way that animals are supposed to be euthanized, but the eye-witness reports speak of animals struggling and in great pain before they finally die.  And, it takes them awhile to die.

The Government of Japan does not discriminate, they will put down sows, mother pigs, and all of her babies.  What is unsaid is how many do they take for their “radiation studies” ?

This is from NPO SALA NETWORK via e-mail :

In Minami-Souma City, over 100 cattle were killed in September – not only the cattle forced in the cattle barn, but also those cattle who were freed.  Most of the cattle you can see in our website were already killed, I’m afraid.

Currently, the pigs are captured including baby pigs. They ran even faster than dogs. Big male pigs are also captured because they are dangerous (the government say). After the culling of the pigs, they are going to capture the remaining cattle.

http://www.salanetwork.or.jp/e_index.html

Personally, I think that the farmers in Nagasaki should learn to live with the wild animals and learn methods that will keep them from their crops.  I don’t agree with hunting them.

 

 

‘Chief of boar affairs’ to fight damage by wild animals in Nagasaki

“Chief of boar affairs” Shigeki Hirata, front right, instructs prefectural officials during a workshop in Sasebo, Nagasaki Prefecture. (Mainichi)

NAGASAKI — Authorities here have coined a new job position, “chief of boar affairs,” and employed an expert to fill it as part of the prefecture’s efforts to prevent persistent damage caused by the wild animals.

The “chief of boar affairs” will be responsible for suggesting and implementing specific measures to help the prefecture get rid of wild boar-inflicted damage that has become a serious nuisance to residents over the past few years. Duties will also include training of other officials, referred to as “A-level instructors,” for similar purposes.

Since 2004, when the prefecture suffered its greatest ever wild boar-inflicted agricultural losses of approximately 457 million yen, officials have implemented various countermeasures including relaxation of hunting regulations, and beginning in 2006 the appointment of wild animal specialists.

The misbehaving animals, however, have kept coming, causing an estimated 400 million yen in damages in fiscal 2010 — twice the previous year’s numbers.

“Learn to see things from a boar’s perspective,” Shigeki Hirata, the newly appointed “chief of boar affairs” advised aspiring “A-level instructors” during a September workshop in Sasebo, Nagasaki Prefecture. Forty-eight people have thus far received “A-level instructor” certification in the training program, which began in fiscal 2009.

Pointing at an approximately 1-meter-high metal fence set up around a farm field near the workshop site, its top tilted outwards, Hirata reminded that a boar’s line of sight is estimated to be about 50 centimeters off the ground. According to his instructions, a tilted fence is more efficient than a straight one, not unlike stone walls surrounding castles that were built tilting outward to ward off rival samurai.

The 40-year-old Hirata, who studied wild boars at the graduate school of the University of Tsukuba, was appointed to the “boar chief” position on Sept. 1, after serving as an expert wildlife advisor to the prefecture.

“There is still a major lack of knowledge of how to prevent wild boar damage and manage protection fences,” Hirata argues. According to him, the animals are quick learners, and that relying on common theories — such as that boars fear cows and that creosol-scented bags chase them away — will in fact have the opposite effect.

Electric fences are also an option for keeping wild boars out, Hirata says, but they can become less effective if weeds grow around them, decreasing the voltage.

According to prefectural estimates, more than 70 percent of the 5,483 reports of agricultural damage inflicted by the animals during fiscal 2010 were from areas where no countermeasures had been taken. Moreover, approximately 60 percent of the sites had no protection fences.

“To prevent further damage we should expand correct measures and promote cooperation among residents,” the chief of boar affairs said.

(Mainichi Japan) October 30, 2011

http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/national/news/20111030p2a00m0na005000c.html